User talk:Robert Flogaus-Faust

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotus cytisoides RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:19, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga granulata RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atriplex littoralis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potentilla argentea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atriplex littoralis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 08:11, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veronica beccabunga RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:51, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saxifraga granulata 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 13:30, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corydalis cava 3 RF 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:23, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa rugosa RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glechoma hederacea RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 20:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tanacetum vulgare 4 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana purpurea 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 15:46, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanula barbata 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vicia grandiflora RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:39, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veronica fruticans 3 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:11, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Esparsette[edit]

Hi @Robert, darf ich dich mal um deine Expertise bitten? Ich habe eine Pflanze fotografiert, die laut plant.net eindeutig die seltene Sand-Esparsette und nicht die übliche Saat-Esparsette sein soll. Laut Biotopkartierung kommen an der Stelle beide vor. Kannst du das Bild mal anschauen?

Plozessor (talk) 14:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Plozessor, ich bin mir da leider auch nicht sicher. Einerseits scheinen etliche der Pflanzen ziemlich hochwüchsig zu sein, wenn sie vergleichbar hoch sind wie der für Sandtrockenrasen eigentlich wohl auch eher untypische Glatthafer im Hintergrund. Andererseits überragen die Blütenstände die nächsten Blätter sehr stark. Ich kann dazu auch nichts sagen, da das ganz schwierige Arten sind. Du könntest es eventuell noch bei [1] versuchen (Anmeldung erforderlich) oder bei [2] (auch ohne Anmekdung möglich, aber nicht auf Pflanzen spezialisiert), aber ich bin mir nicht sicher, ob da die Art bestimmbar ist. Viele Grüße --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Alles klar, danke! Plozessor (talk) 05:43, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bupleurum stellatum RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allium sphaerocephalon RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 00:24, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trifolium dubium 2 RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:48, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artemisia glacialis RF.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:59, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Location?[edit]

Hi Robert - I have added an estimated location to File:Drymocallis rupestris 2 RF.jpg based on the description. Can you check, and correct it as needed, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 20:09, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]